The issue in this case is whether the Texas Public Information Act gives the University of Texas discretion to withhold information concerning the results of disciplinary proceedings.

The issue is whether a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality order approving a permit to discharge wastewater into a creek violates state and federal law governing water-quality standards.

These cross-petitions raise issues of briefing waiver and whether fiduciary duties are owed among business partners.

This case raises questions about the extraterritorial reach of Texas's civil barratry statute and whether barratry claims are subject to a two or four-year statute of limitations.

The central issue in this case is the interpretation of a deed restriction.

In this case, the issues are the propriety of an assignment of a legal-malpractice claim and whether a jury instruction impermissibly commented on the weight of the evidence.

A main issue is whether a creditor's bona fide protections pass to a subsequent purchaser if the property is purchased through a receivership sale rather than through foreclosure.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court must sever and abate Insurance Code claims when a motorist sues her insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits and violations of the Insurance Code.

This case raises questions of who owns the right to use underground salt caverns created through the salt-extraction process and how a salt royalty interest is calculated.

This case concerns the proper burden of proof to support a permanent protective order that prohibits contact between a parent and minor child.

This case concerns the interpretation of an excess insurance policy that follows an underlying policy, except where the terms, conditions, definitions, and exclusions of the policies conflict.

The issue is whether companies that own and operate correctional and detention facilities qualify for a sales-tax exemption under state law.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred by denying the defendants' motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens.

This case concerns the validity of an administrative rule governing immigration detention centers and the mootness and reviewability of the rule challenge.

This case concerns the application of the futility doctrine to inverse-condemnation and takings claims.

This car-crash case involves arguments about the sufficiency of the evidence, charge error, and damages.

The issue in these cases is the applicability of the Texas Citizens Participation Act to a motion to compel discovery that includes a request for attorney's fees.

The issue in these cases is the applicability of the Texas Citizens Participation Act to a motion to compel discovery that includes a request for attorney's fees.

The issue is whether the juvenile court erred in transferring a case to criminal district court where the defendant was a minor at the time of the murder but was charged after his 18th birthday.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court had specific jurisdiction over a foreign manufacturer for claims based on an allegedly defective product.

The main issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs' negligence suit against Leibman to recover damages for injuries sustained in a dog attack triggered the Texas Medical Liability Act's expert-report requirement.

The Administrative Procedure Act waives sovereign immunity in a suit seeking a declaration about an administrative rule's "applicability." The issue in this case is whether the request for declaratory relief challenges a rule's application (how the rule applies) as opposed to its applicability (whether the rule applies).

The issues include (1) when an off-duty officer working for a private employer is considered to be on duty; (2) whether negligence claims by police officers responding to a request for assistance should have been pleaded as premises-liability claims; and (3) whether the common law "firefighter rule" applies.