This car-crash case involves arguments about the sufficiency of the evidence, charge error, and damages.

The issue in these cases is the applicability of the Texas Citizens Participation Act to a motion to compel discovery that includes a request for attorney's fees.

The issue in these cases is the applicability of the Texas Citizens Participation Act to a motion to compel discovery that includes a request for attorney's fees.

The issue is whether the juvenile court erred in transferring a case to criminal district court where the defendant was a minor at the time of the murder but was charged after his 18th birthday.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court had specific jurisdiction over a foreign manufacturer for claims based on an allegedly defective product.

The main issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs' negligence suit against Leibman to recover damages for injuries sustained in a dog attack triggered the Texas Medical Liability Act's expert-report requirement.

The Administrative Procedure Act waives sovereign immunity in a suit seeking a declaration about an administrative rule's "applicability." The issue in this case is whether the request for declaratory relief challenges a rule's application (how the rule applies) as opposed to its applicability (whether the rule applies).

The issues include (1) when an off-duty officer working for a private employer is considered to be on duty; (2) whether negligence claims by police officers responding to a request for assistance should have been pleaded as premises-liability claims; and (3) whether the common law "firefighter rule" applies.

This case involves contract interpretation and repudiation, lost-profits damages, and the election-of-remedies doctrine.

The issue is whether the evidence is sufficient to create a fact issue about whether it was apparent to a restaurant that its patron was obviously intoxicated.

Case details to come.

At issue in this case is whether a nonmember nonprofit corporation may amend its articles of incorporation when those articles provided that no amendments shall be made without the prior approval of a religious conference.

At issue is whether claims under the Texas Constitution's "republican form of government" clause present a nonjusticiable political question.

The principal issue in this case is whether child-support payments should be considered when determining a spouse's eligibility for spousal maintenance.