The issues in this will challenge are (1) whether the person contesting a will must establish, as her burden, that acceptance of benefits does not defeat her standing; (2) whether acceptance of benefits defeats her standing; and (3) whether the appeals court erred by taking judicial notice of documents that were not admitted in the trial court.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court complied with the statutory requirements for extending its jurisdiction over a suit to terminate parental rights initiated by the Department of Family and Protective Services.

In this case, seeking cancellation of a warrant deed, the principal issue is whether the party moving for summary judgment based on limitations carries the burden to disprove that limitations is tolled by the unsound-mind provision.