The issues in this case are (1) whether, and in what circumstances, a guardian may petition for divorce on behalf of a ward; and (2) the effect of one spouse's death on the appeal from a divorce decree.
At issue in this case is whether a police officer in a high-speed chase acted with reckless disregard such that the emergency exception under the Texas Tort Claims Act does not apply and immunity is waived.
At issue in this case is whether a police officer acted with reckless disregard such that the Texas Tort Claims Act's emergency exception does not apply, and whether the officer acted in good faith such that he is entitled to official immunity.
The issue is whether a nonprofit health organization certified under Section 162.001(b) of the Occupations Code can be held vicariously liable for the negligence of a physician employed by the organization.
The issue in this case is the sufficiency of an expert report supporting a health care liability claim against a hospital directly under Chapter 74 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
The issue in this case is whether sovereign immunity or the separation of powers doctrine protects government lawyers from professional discipline procedures arising from alleged misrepresentations made to a court.
The issue in this case is whether the Texas Public Information Act gives the University of Texas discretion to withhold information concerning the results of disciplinary proceedings.
The issue is whether a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality order approving a permit to discharge wastewater into a creek violates state and federal law governing water-quality standards.
This mandamus arises out of the "tag-along" transfer of the underlying lawsuit to an MDL involving other sex-trafficking cases. The issue in this case is whether the MDL panel erred by refusing to remand the case, thereby allowing it to remain in the MDL.
This case raises questions about the extraterritorial reach of Texas's civil barratry statute and whether barratry claims are subject to a two or four-year statute of limitations.
At issue in this certified question is the meaning of the phrase "has proven to be operational" in the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality's definition of "best available control technology."
In this case, the issues are the propriety of an assignment of a legal-malpractice claim and whether a jury instruction impermissibly commented on the weight of the evidence.
A main issue is whether a creditor's bona fide protections pass to a subsequent purchaser if the property is purchased through a receivership sale rather than through foreclosure.
The issue in this case is whether the trial court must sever and abate Insurance Code claims when a motorist sues her insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits and violations of the Insurance Code.
This case raises questions of who owns the right to use underground salt caverns created through the salt-extraction process and how a salt royalty interest is calculated.
This case concerns the interpretation of an excess insurance policy that follows an underlying policy, except where the terms, conditions, definitions, and exclusions of the policies conflict.
This case concerns the validity of an administrative rule governing immigration detention centers and the mootness and reviewability of the rule challenge.
